🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."