Will McLaren Keep Playing Fair and Stop Verstappen? - F1 Q&A
Red Bull's Max Verstappen narrowed the deficit in the drivers' championship by winning both the sprint race and feature races at the Austin Grand Prix.
Lando Norris came in second position on race day to narrow Oscar Piastri's championship lead to 14 points with five races remaining.
Four-times world champion Verstappen is now just 40 points trailing Oscar Piastri heading into this upcoming Mexico City Grand Prix.
Must McLaren Accept Reality of F1 - That to Win, You Can't Always Play Fair?
The McLaren team are fully conscious of the challenge they face with Max Verstappen and the Red Bull team in the drivers' championship this season, but they don't believe to modify their method to running the team.
They will continue to give their two drivers the best chance they can and run the team on a basis of equity and equanimity.
"This is the way we intend racing. This is the method in which we tackle racing, and we aim to remain fair, and we want to apply equality to our drivers."
Team principal Andrea Stella is a veteran of numerous championship fights. He won the title as race engineer to Kimi Raikkonen in the 2007 season when the Ferrari racer recovered 17 points under the old scoring system in two races to win the championship, while McLaren collapsed.
And he missed out on the title as race engineer to Alonso in the 2010 season, when Ferrari messed up their race strategy at the final race of the season and allowed Vettel and Red Bull to sneak the title from their grasp.
Stella stated after the Grand Prix in Austin: "We view the next five races as opportunities to increase the lead on Max. And when it involves having to make a call as to a driver, this will only be determined by mathematics."
"We rely on the experience. I can remember at least the 2007 season, 2010, in which you go to the last race and it's actually the third-placed driver that claims the title. So we're not going to make decisions unless this is closed by the calculations."
Why Did McLaren Stop Development on This Year's Car?
All teams this year have had to confront the conundrum of for how long to concentrate on their 2025 season car while also ensuring they are as ready as they can be for the significant rules overhaul coming for 2026.
In F1, it's typically the situation that if a team gets it wrong at the beginning of a new rules cycle, it can take a long time to recover. And if they succeed, that benefit can last for a while - consider Red Bull in 2022 and 2023, the most recent occasion the rules changed.
The McLaren team began this season with the best car, after investing a lot of innovation into their 2025 design.
They continued to improve it for a while, but were experiencing reduced benefits. So when evaluating the bang for buck they were getting on their 2025 season car compared to 2026, it became an straightforward choice to redirect attention to the following season.
The Red Bull team have closed the gap since introducing their new underfloor and nose section at the Monza Grand Prix, but the McLaren car remains competitive - team boss Stella stated he thought Norris had the pace to challenge for the win in Texas had he not finished following Charles Leclerc.
"We just have to keep optimising the car performance and continue executing good weekends. And from this perspective, if you consider a Grand Prix like Baku City Circuit, we failed to optimize the car's potential and we didn't execute a perfect performance."
"Therefore we have a large chance, and the outcome of this championship and the drivers' championship is in our control. It's not placed in another team's control."
Driver Transfers: How Challenging Is It to Switch Teams?
First of all, I'm not sure the inquiry has an entirely accurate basis. It's correct that each of Lewis Hamilton and Carlos Sainz had slightly difficult opening phases of the championship, in different ways, and that they are now performing much better.
Carlos Sainz and Albon do now look very even. However, it's not so clear that, in Hamilton's case, he is currently the "equal" of Charles Leclerc - or not consistently, at least.
Lewis Hamilton has failed to outperform Leclerc very often at all this season, either in qualifying or race.
He is currently significantly nearer than he was. He is consistently qualifying within a small fraction of a second of Leclerc, but in qualifying battles it's four-two to Charles Leclerc since the summer break.
This last weekend in Texas, on one of Lewis Hamilton's preferred circuits, he was a second behind his teammate when the Monaco driver made his tire change, and dropped thirteen seconds over the remaining portion of the race.
In hindsight, Charles Leclerc was on the best strategy. Regardless, over the championship, and even now, it's hard to claim that on average Leclerc has not been the better Ferrari driver this year.
Both Hamilton and Carlos Sainz have talked about how challenging it is to switch teams, and we have to accept their statements.
Hamilton would not say even now that he was fully adapted to Ferrari - and he is expecting the new rules next season will suit him; he has never particularly liked these ground-effect vehicles.
There is a great deal for a racing driver to understand and adapt to when they change constructors, as Hamilton has described repeatedly this season. But not all faces difficulties in this way.
Fernando Alonso, for example, was performing well from the beginning of the 2023 when he transferred to Aston Martin. And would Max Verstappen struggle if he changed constructors? I believe most in F1 would anticipate he wouldn't.
How Soon Can We Determine The Coming Season's Team Performance?
Until the F1 cars run for the initial time in pre-season testing next year, no-one will understand how the constructors are performing in the upcoming season.
The first test, in Catalunya on 26-30 January, is private because the constructors wanted to get their heads around their initial track time of the power unit changes without the prying eyes of the media.
So the pair of sessions in Sakhir on February 11-13 and February 18-20 will be the initial occasion a certain indication of relative performance becomes apparent.
But, as ever, it's not until the first race that the complete and precise situation will become clear.